Slide background
Slide background
Slide background
Slide background
Slide background
Slide background
Slide background

Cladding crisis victims “should not be left out of pocket”: Law Society

The Law Society has called on the Government to protect leaseholders from the costs of making their homes safe from potentially deadly cladding.

Chancery Lane said homeowners had “almost no recourse available to them as, because of an ancient quirk of English law, buyers of defective homes cannot recover the cost of rectifying them from councils or building inspectors who gave approval for them to be occupied”.

President David Greene added: “Many properties built over the last 20 years are potentially dangerous as a result of unclear building regulations, poor building practices, defective materials and inadequate enforcement of the rules.

“Conveyancing lawyers complete the purchase of new homes only after a building control inspector has issued a completion certificate for the property, and a cover note has been issued for new build guarantee insurance.”

He added: “Where dangerous defects exist due to inadequate building regulations and/or inadequate enforcement, and the costs of remediation are not covered by guarantee insurance, the costs should not be allowed to fall on long leaseholders.

“The UK government should support leaseholders who are faced with significant and unavoidable costs through no fault of their own, and who have no realistic recourse.

“In other circumstances, where responsibility for the defects rests solely with developers, material suppliers or building contractors, the UK government must find a way of alleviating the financial burden on the home-owners, for example providing the funding upfront so that buildings can be made safe and then seeking recourse against those responsible at a later stage.”

The Law Society has recommended that:

  • the UK government conduct a comprehensive assessment of the expected cost of remediating buildings with unsafe cladding to make them safe. "Once the full cost has been established, the government should act to ensure costs that must be borne by long leaseholders are kept to a minimum, and ideally zero."
  • where long leaseholders are faced with unavoidable costs as a result of failings with the Building Control Regime, these leaseholders should be entitled to government support "to ensure that they do not have to pay the price for a system that failed to protect them".

Mr Greene said: “Our members are reporting that the absence of a forthcoming solution to this issue is causing sales and purchases to stall, which may cause significant disruption in the market and have knock on effects on consumers and the wider economy.

“We would welcome the opportunity to work with the UK government to identify and implement solutions for long leaseholders.”

Fraser Public Sector 600

Sheriffs Office TSO animated banner

Sponsored Editorial